Abercrombie, N. and Longhurst, B. (1998a) Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126.
Abercrombie, N. and Longhurst, B. (1998b) ‘Changing audiences, changing paradigms of research Chapter one’, in Audiences: a sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1024126.
Alasuutari, P. (1999) Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. London: Sage.
Ang, I. (2006) ‘On the politics of empirical audience research.’, in Media and cultural studies: keyworks. Rev. ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=239901.
Ang, I. and Couling, D. (1996) Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. New York: Routledge. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10763823.
Ang, Ien (1991) Desperately Seeking the Audience. Routledge. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=165716.
Arild Fetveit (no date) ‘Anti-essentialism and reception studies: In defense of the text’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4, pp. 173–199. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/136787790100400203.
Athique, A. (2018) ‘The dynamics and potentials of big data for audience research’, Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), pp. 59–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717693681.
Bainbridge, C., Ward, I. and Yates, C. (2014) Television and psychoanalysis: psycho-cultural perspectives. London: Karnac. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1574555.
Barker, M. (2006) ‘I Have Seen the Future and It Is Not Here Yet ...; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research’, The Communication Review, 9(2), pp. 123–141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663310.
Barker, M. and Petley, J. (2001a) Ill effects: the media violence debate. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=84561.
Barker, M. and Petley, J. (2001b) ‘Introduction: from bad research to good.’, in Ill effects: the media violence debate. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665221790002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
Behrenshausen, B.G. (2013) ‘The active audience, again: Player-centric game studies and the problem of binarism’, New Media & Society, 15(6), pp. 872–889. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462843.
Bird, S.E. (2011) ‘ARE WE ALL PRODUSERS NOW?’, Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), pp. 502–516. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532.
Birgitta Höijer (no date) ‘Ontological Assumptions and Generalizations in Qualitative (Audience) Research’, European Journal of Communication, 23, pp. 275–294. Available at: http://ejc.sagepub.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/search?author1=Hoijer&fulltext=Ontological%20Assumptions%20and%20Generalizations%20in%20Qualitative%20(Audience)%20Research&pubdate_year=2008&volume=23&firstpage=275&submit=yes.
Blackman, L. and Walkerdine, V. (2000) Mass hysteria: critical psychology and media studies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Bolongaro, K.A.M. (2013) ‘Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren & Charles Ess (Eds.): Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture: Perspectives, Practices and Futures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 2012.’, MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research, 29(55). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v29i55.9716.
Bonnett, A. (2001) How to argue: a student’s guide. Harlow: Pearson Education. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5185704.
Brand New You | Kanopy (no date). Available at: https://le.kanopy.com/video/brand-new-you-makeover-television-and-american-dream.
Brooker, W. and Jermyn, D. (2003) The audience studies reader. London: Routledge.
Campbell, H. (2013) Digital religion: understanding religious practice in new media worlds. London: Routledge. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1097827.
Campbell, H. and Garner, S. (2016) Networked theology: negotiating faith in digital culture. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5248646.
Campbell, H. and Grieve, G.P. (eds) (2014) Playing with religion in digital games. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=1680203.
Campbell, H.A. and La Pastina, A.C. (2010) ‘How the iPhone became divine: new media, religion and the intertextual circulation of meaning’, New Media & Society, 12(7), pp. 1191–1207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810362204.
Cantril, H. et al. (1982) The invasion from Mars: a study in the psychology of panic : with the complete script of the famous Orson Welles broadcast. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Cavalcante, A., Press, A. and Sender, K. (2017a) ‘Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life’, Feminist Media Studies, 17(1), pp. 1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822.
Cavalcante, A., Press, A. and Sender, K. (2017b) ‘Feminist reception studies in a post-audience age: returning to audiences and everyday life’, Feminist Media Studies, 17(1), pp. 1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1261822.
Cheong, P.H. (2012) Digital religion, social media, and culture: perspectives, practices, and futures. New York: Peter Lang.
Claydon, E. and Whitehouse-Hart, J. (2018) ‘Overcoming’ the “Battlefield of the Mind”: A Psycho-linguistic Examination of the Discourse of Digital-Televangelists Self-Help Texts’’, Language and Psychoanalysis, 7 (2) 2-28. Available at: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7565/landp.v7i21587.
Couldry, N. (2005) ‘The Extended Audience: Scanning the Horizon’’, in Media audiences. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dallas, S. (1995) ‘On the Audience Commodity and its work’, in Approaches to media: a reader. London: Arnold.
Das, R. (2017) ‘Audiences: a decade of transformations – reflections from the CEDAR network on emerging directions in audience analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, 39(8), pp. 1257–1267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717717632.
Das, R. and Sonia, L. (2013) ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use’, in A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665880050002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
David Buckingham (no date) ‘`Creative’ visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals’, Media, Culture & Society, 31, pp. 633–652. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335280.
Dovey, J. (2000) Freakshow: first person media and factual television. London: Pluto Press. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=2001153.
Duffy, B.E. (2013) Remake, remodel: women’s magazines in the digital age. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Eagleton, T. (1994) Ideology. London: Longman. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1746767.
Elizabeth Jane Evans (no date) ‘Character, audience agency and transmedia drama’, Media, Culture & Society, 30, pp. 197–213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707086861.
Elliott, P. (1974) ‘Uses and gratifications research: A critique and a sociological alternative.’, in The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, pp. 249–268.
Ferrucci, P. and Painter, C. (2017) ‘Print Versus Digital’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(2), pp. 124–139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859917690533.
Gauntlett, D. (1998) ‘Ten things wrong with the "effects model.”’, in Approaches to audiences: a reader. London: Arnold.
Gerbner et al, G. (2009) ‘Growing up with television: The Cultivation Perspective’, in Media effects: advances in theory and research. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10274244.
Gillespie, M. (1995a) Television, ethnicity and cultural change. London: Routledge.
Gillespie, M. (1995b) Television, ethnicity and cultural change. London: Routledge.
Ginsburg, F.D., Abu-Lughod, L. and Larkin, B. (2002) Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10058549.
Gitlin, T. (2000) Inside prime time. Rev. ed. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Glad, B. and Beradt, C. (1969a) ‘The Third Reich of Dreams’, The American Political Science Review, 63(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1954716.
Glad, B. and Beradt, C. (1969b) ‘The Third Reich of Dreams’, The American Political Science Review, 63(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1954716.
Gorton, K. (2009a) Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997.
Gorton, K. (2009b) Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=536997.
Gray, J. (2017) ‘Reviving audience studies’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), pp. 79–83. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266680.
Greene, Kira (2000) ‘TV’s test pilots.’, Broadcasting & Cable., 130(30). Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=3364522&site=ehost-live.
Hall, S. (1980) ‘Encoding/ decoding’, in Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. London: Hutchinson in association with the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham, pp. 117–128. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769750002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
Hall, S. (1994) ‘Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall’, in Viewing, reading, listening: audiences and cultural reception. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, pp. 253–274.
Harris, J. and Watson, E. (2007) The Oprah phenomenon. Updated edition. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=1920897&ppg=15.
Hartley, J., Burgess, J. and Bruns, A. (2013a) A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=531267.
Hartley, J., Burgess, J. and Bruns, A. (2013b) A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=3422436.
Hartley, J., Burgess, J. and Bruns, A. (eds) (2013c) ‘The End of Audiences?’, in A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Chichester, [England]: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/reader.action?docID=3422436&ppg=126.
Hayes, Dade dhayes@nbmedia.com (2015) ‘Inside TV’s Secret Lab. (cover story)’, Broadcasting & Cable., 145(19), pp. 4–6. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy3.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bah&AN=102711548&site=ehost-live.
Helen Wood (no date) ‘The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis’, Media, Culture & Society, 29, pp. 75–103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706072000.
Henry Jenkins (no date) ‘The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7, pp. 33–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877904040603.
Hepp, A. (2012) Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: Polity. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1180925.
Hermes, J., van den Berg, A. and Mol, M. (2013) ‘Sleeping with the enemy: Audience studies and critical literacy’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(5), pp. 457–473. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912474547.
Hills, M. (2007) ‘Michael Jackson Fans on Trial? "Documenting” Emotivism and Fandom in’, Social Semiotics, 17(4), pp. 459–477. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330701637056.
Hobson, D. (1982) Crossroads: the drama of a soap opera. London: Methuen.
Hoover, S.M. and Clark, L.S. (2002) Practicing religion in the age of the media: explorations in media, religion, and culture. New York: Columbia University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=895172.
Ian Hutchby (2001) ‘Technologies, Texts and Affordances’, Sociology, 35(2), pp. 441–456. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42856294?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Jackson, R.L. and Sage reference on-line (2010) Encyclopedia of identity. London: SAGE. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/identity/SAGE.xml.
Jenkins, H. (2008) Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. Updated and with a new afterword. New York, N.Y.: New York University Press.
Jermyn, D. and Holmes, S. (2006) ‘The Audience is Dead; Long Live the Audience!: Interactivity, “Telephilia” and the Contemporary Television Audience’, Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 1(1), pp. 49–57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.1.1.8.
Jin, D. (2016) New Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Power in the Age of Social Media. Baltimore: University of Illinois Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4443546.
José van Dijck (no date) ‘Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content’, Media, Culture & Society, 31, pp. 41–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098245.
Kavka, M. (2008a) Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, M. (2008b) Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, M. (2008c) Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kavka, M. (2008d) Reality television, affect and intimacy: reality matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lacey, N. (2002) Media institutions and audiences: key concepts in media studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=327969.
Lapsley, R. (2006) ‘Psychoanalytic Criticism’, in The Routledge companion to critical theory. London: Routledge.
Lee McGuigan (2012) ‘Consumers: The Commodity Product of Interactive Commercial Television, or, Is Dallas Smythe’s Thesis More Germane Than Ever?’, The Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912459756.
Liebes, T. and Katz, E. (1993) The export of meaning: cross-cultural readings of Dallas. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Livingstone, sonia (1998) ‘Relationships between media and audiences: Prospects for future audience reception studies.’, in Media, ritual, and identity. London: Routledge. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=169411.
Livingstone, S. and Das, R. (2013) ‘The End of Audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amidst the uncertainties of use.’, in A companion to new media dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 104–122. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665206730002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
Livingstone, S.M. (1998) Making sense of television: the psychology of audience interpretation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Lofton, K. (2011) ‘Religion and the American Celebrity’, Social Compass, 58(3), pp. 346–352. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768611412143.
Long, P. and Wall, T. (2012a) Media studies: texts, production, context. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615.
Long, P. and Wall, T. (2012b) Media studies: texts, production, context. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=812615.
Lowes, R., Peters, H. and Turner, M.C. (2004) The international student’s guide: studying in English at university. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=10218078.
Lundby, K. (2011) ‘PATTERNS OF BELONGING IN ONLINE/OFFLINE INTERFACES OF RELIGION’, Information, Communication & Society, 14(8), pp. 1219–1235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077.
Madianou, M. (2014) ‘Smartphones as Polymedia’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), pp. 667–680. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12069.
Madianou, M. and Miller, D. (2013) ‘Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), pp. 169–187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486.
Manley, J. and Crociani-Windland, L. (2018) Social dreaming, associative thinking and intensities of affect. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5497847.
Mansfield, N. (2000) ‘Lacan : The Subject is Language’, in Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=286495.
Martin J. Barker (no date) ‘The Lord of the Rings and “Identification”: A Critical Encounter’, European Journal of Communication, 20, pp. 353–378. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0267323105055262.
Mayer, V. (2016) ‘The Places Where Audience Studies and Production Studies Meet’, Television & New Media, 17(8), pp. 706–718. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416652482.
McKee, A. (2003) Textual analysis: a beginner’s guide. London: Sage Publications. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=254647.
McLeod, D., Wise, D. and Perryman, M. (2017) ‘Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perception and their consequences’, Review of Communication REsearch, Volume 5.
Mediatization and the ‘molding force’ of the media (no date). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2012-0001.
Meissner, W W (no date) ‘Notes on identification. I. Origins in Freud’, The Psychoanalytic quarterly, 39(4), pp. 563–89. Available at: https://librarysearch.le.ac.uk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_medline4921741&context=PC&vid=44UOLE_NUI&lang=en_US&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,W.W.%20Meissner,%201970.%20Notes%20on%20Identification%20I.%20Origens%20in%20Freud,%20Psychoanalytic%20Quarterly,%2039,%20563-589.%20&pcAvailability=false.
Melissa A. ClickSuzanne Scott (9AD) The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (Routledge Media and Cultural Studies Companions). Routledge; 1 edition. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=5122937.
Michael O’Shaughnessy (1994a) ‘Promoting “emotion”: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, 97, pp. 44–48.
Michael O’Shaughnessy (1994b) ‘Promoting “emotion”: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, 97, pp. 44–48.
Miller, D. (2011) Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: Polity. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=571931.
Mirca Madianou (no date) ‘Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16, pp. 169–187. Available at: http://ics.sagepub.com/search?author1=Madianou&fulltext=Polymedia:%20Towards%20a%20new%20theory%20of%20digital%20media%20in%20interpersonal%20communication&pubdate_year=2013&volume=16&firstpage=169&submit=yes.
Modleski, T. (1984) Loving with a vengeance: mass-produced fantasies for women. New York: Methuen.
Morgan, D. (2013) ‘Religion and media: A critical review of recent developments’, Critical Research on Religion, 1(3), pp. 347–356. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303213506476.
Morley, D. (2006a) ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’, The Communication Review, 9(2), pp. 101–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286.
Morley, D. (2006b) ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’, The Communication Review, 9(2), pp. 101–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663286.
Mytton, G., Diem, P. and Dam, P.H. van (2016) Media audience research: a guide for professionals. Third edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Incorporated. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4440204.
Nancy Thumin (2013) ‘Self-Representation and Digital Culture’, European Journal of Communication, 28(6), pp. 729–730. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113505802c.
Neilsen Launches ‘Neilsen Twitter TV Ratings’ (no date). Available at: http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=263c30ed-675a-4554-859f-e35ae5e4887b%40sessionmgr120&hid=110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c51050908.
Nightingale, V. (1996) Studying the television audience: the shock of the real. London: Routledge.
Nikolas Coupland (10AD) The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=4041769.
Ong, J.C. (2009) ‘Watching the Nation, Singing the Nation: London-Based Filipino Migrants’ Identity Constructions in News and Karaoke Practices’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 2(2), pp. 160–181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01033.x.
O’Shaughnessy, M. (1994a) ‘Promoting “emotion”: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, 97.
O’Shaughnessy, M. (1994b) ‘Promoting “emotion”: Feelings, film studies and teaching or understanding films; understanding ourselves’, Metro Media and Education, 97.
P, M. (1994) ‘Made to Order and Standardized Audiences: forms of reality in audience measurements’, in Audience making: how the media create the audience. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, pp. 57–74.
Paddy Scannell (no date) ‘Big Brother as a Television Event’, Television & New Media, 3, pp. 271–282. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/152747640200300303.
Palmgreen, p, Wenner, L.A. and Rosengren, K.E. (1985) ‘Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years.’, in Media gratifications research: current perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. xx–xxx.
Pears, R. and Shields, G.J. (2022) Cite them right: the essential referencing guide. 12th edition. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=6992940.
Pink, S. (2007) Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=LeicesterU&isbn=9781446296035.
Piper, H. (2006) ‘Understanding Reality Television * Reality TV - Audiences and Popular Factual Television * Reality TV - Realism and Revelation’, Screen, 47(1), pp. 133–138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjl012.
Press, A.L. (2006) ‘Audience Research in the Post-Audience Age: An Introduction to Barker and Morley’, The Communication Review, 9(2), pp. 93–100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420600663278.
Radway, J.A. (1991a) Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363.
Radway, J.A. (1991b) Reading the romance: women, patriarchy and popular literature. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=880363.
Radway, J.A. (1991c) Reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popular literature. 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=880363.
Ranjana Das (no date) ‘Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre’, European Journal of Communication, 26, pp. 343–360. Available at: http://ejc.sagepub.com/search?author1=Das&fulltext=Converging%20Perspectives%20in%20Audience%20Studies%20and%20Digital%20Literacies:%20Youthful%20Interpretations%20of%20an%20Online%20Genre&pubdate_year=2011&volume=26&firstpage=343&submit=yes.
Readdy, T. and Ebbeck, V. (2012) ‘Weighing in on NBC’s The Biggest Loser’, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(4), pp. 579–586. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599255.
Redman, P., Maples, W., and Open University (2017) Good essay writing: a social sciences guide. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Redman, P. and Open University (2008a) Attachment: sociology and social worlds. Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University.
Redman, P. and Open University (2008b) Attachment: sociology and social worlds. Manchester: Manchester University Press in association with the Open University.
Rippen, A. (2014) ‘Internet: Implications and Future Possibilities’’, in Muslims And The New Information And Communication Technologies Notes From An Emerging And Infinite Field. Springer. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1636818.
Rose, G. (2012) Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
Rosengren, k. E. (1974) ‘Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined’, in The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, pp. 269–286.
Rosengren, K. (1996) ‘Chapter 2 - Combinations, comparisons and confrontations: towards a comprehensive theory of audience research’, in The audience and its landscape. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, pp. 23–51.
Ross, K. and Nightingale, V. (2003) Media and audiences: new perspectives. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Open University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=295455.
Ross, K. and Playdon, P. (2001) Black marks: minority ethnic audiences and media. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Ruggiero, T.E. (2000) ‘Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century’, Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), pp. 3–37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02.
Sandler, J. and Sigmund Freud Center for Study and Research in Psychoanalysis (Universiṭah haʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim) (1988) Projection, identification, projective identification. London: Karnac Books. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=709550.
Schrøder, K.C. (1987) ‘Convergence of Antagonistic Traditions? The Case of Audience Research’, European journal of communication, 2(1), pp. 7–31.
Sconce, J. (1998) ‘The Voice from the Void’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(2), pp. 211–232. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779980010020401.
Sconce, J. (2000) Haunted media: electronic presence from telegraphy to television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Seiter, ellen (1990a) ‘Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview’, Cultural Studies, 4(1).
Seiter, ellen (1990b) ‘Making distinctions in TV audience research: Case study of a troubling interview’, Cultural Studies, 4(1).
Seiter, E. (1989a) Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. London: Routledge.
Seiter, E. (1989b) Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. London: Routledge.
Sender, K. (2006) ‘Queens for a Day:                              and the Neoliberal Project’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(2), pp. 131–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180600714505.
Sender, K. (2012) The makeover: reality television and reflexive audiences. New York: New York University Press. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814740699.001.0001.
Sender, K. (2015) ‘Reconsidering Reflexivity: Audience Research and Reality Television’, The Communication Review, 18(1), pp. 37–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.996414.
Sender, K. and Sullivan, M. (2008) ‘Epidemics of will, failures of self-esteem: Responding to fat bodies in                              and’, Continuum, 22(4), pp. 573–584. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310802190046.
Serials Solutions Article Linker - (no date). Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.title=Audience+Economics&rft.au=PHILIP+M.+NAPOLI&rft.date=2003-09-25&rft.pub=Columbia+University+Press&rft_id=info:doi/10.7312%2Fnapo12652&rft.externalDocID=napo12652&paramdict=en-US.
Shanahan, J. and Morgan, M. (1999) Television and its viewers: cultivation research and theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/leicester/Doc?id=5001729.
Skeggs, B., Thumim, N. and Wood, H. (2008a) ‘“Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV”’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(1), pp. 5–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961.
Skeggs, B., Thumim, N. and Wood, H. (2008b) ‘“Oh goodness, I am watching reality TV”’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(1), pp. 5–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407084961.
Skeggs, B. and Wood, H. (2008) ‘The labour of transformation and circuits of value “around” reality television’, Continuum, 22(4), pp. 559–572. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310801983664.
Skeggs, B. and Wood, H. (2011a) Reality television and class. London: BFI.
Skeggs, B. and Wood, H. (2011b) Reality television and class. London: BFI.
Skeggs, B. and Wood, H. (2011c) ‘Turning it on is a class act: immediated object relations with television’, Media, Culture & Society, 33(6), pp. 941–951. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711412298.
Skeggs, B. and Wood, H. (2012) Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. New York: Routledge. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761.
Skeggs, B. and Wood, H. (2014) Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Florence: Taylor & Francis Group. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=957761.
‘Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem.’ (2014) Psychology of Popular Media Culture [Preprint]. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2014-33471-001&site=ehost-live.
Sonia Livingstone (no date) ‘The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to Do in the Age of the Internet?’, European Journal of Communication, 19(1), pp. 75–86. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0267323104040695.
Stephen Parker (no date) ‘Winnicott’s object relations theory and the work of the Holy Spirit’, Journal of Psychology and Theology [Preprint]. Available at: http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy4.lib.le.ac.uk/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA192863906&v=2.1&u=leicester&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w.
‘The communication review (Yverdon, Switzerland)’ (2006), 9(2), pp. 123–141. Available at: http://gl9sn3dh2u.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I+have+seen+the+future+and+it+is+not+here+yet+...%3A+Or%2C+on+being+ambitious+for+audience+research&rft.jtitle=The+Communication+Review&rft.au=Barker%2C+M&rft.date=2006&rft.eissn=1547-7487&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=141&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0290060002004&paramdict=en-US.
Thumim, N. (2012) Self-representation and digital culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=990162.
Tincknell, E. and Raghuram, P. (2002) ‘Big Brother: Reconfiguring the `active’ audience of cultural studies?’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(2), pp. 199–215. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1364942002005002159.
Toynbee, J. (2006) ‘The Media’s View of the Audience’, in Media Production. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 91–133.
Tse, T. (2018) ‘Reconceptualising prosumption beyond the cultural turn : passive fashion consumption in Korea and China’, journal of Consumer Culture, o (o) 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518804300.
Tsuria, R. et al. (2017) ‘Approaches to digital methods in studies of digital religion’, The Communication Review, 20(2), pp. 73–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2017.1304137.
Tulloch, J. (1999) ‘The implied audience in soap opera production: Everyday Rhetorical Strategies among television professionals’, in Rethinking the media audience: the new agenda. London: Sage, pp. 151–178. Available at: http://ezproxy.lib.le.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.myilibrary.com?id=226264.
Twitter to drive TV Ratings beyond an ‘assumption’ of engagement (7AD) B and T Weekly. Available at: http://www.bandt.com.au/media/twitter-to-drive-tv-ratings-beyond-an-assumption-o.
Victor Costello (no date) ‘Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom’, Television & New Media, 8, pp. 124–143. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476406299112.
Wasko, J. (2005) ‘Reality TV: Performance, Authenticity, and Television Audiences’, in A companion to television. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, p. A-Hill. Available at: http://le.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5665769740002746&institutionId=2746&customerId=2745.
Webster, James G. (1998) ‘Audience, The’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jbem42&collection=journals&page=190.
Webster, J.G., Phalen, P.F. and Lichty, L.W. (2006) Ratings analysis: the theory and practice of audience research. 3rd ed. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. (2014) Psychosocial explorations of film and television viewing: ordinary audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/leicester/detail.action?docID=1880204.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. and SpringerLink (Online service) (2014a) Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146.
Whitehouse-Hart, J. and SpringerLink (Online service) (2014b) Psychosocial Explorations of Film and Television Viewing: Ordinary Audience. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465146.
Williams, K. (2003) ‘Effects What Effects chapter 7’, in Understanding Media Theory. Arnold.
Wood, H. (2004) ‘What Reading the Romance Did for Us’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(2), pp. 147–154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549404042487.
Xu, S. and Campbell, H.A. (2018) ‘Surveying digital religion in China: Characteristics of religion on the Internet in Mainland China’, The Communication Review, 21(4), pp. 253–276. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2018.1535729.
Ytre-Arne, B. (2011) ‘“I want to hold it in my hands”: readers’ experiences of the phenomenological differences between women’s magazines online and in print’, Media, Culture & Society, 33(3), pp. 467–477. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711398766.